---

Agreed that FAST wins over DPL hands down when available... However, this is what I was implying in my previous post...

Does it make better sense to employ a sonographer, who is available 24/7. The expense and hassle of training a 'doctor' fully to the extent of being 'FAST competent', who would only be doing it occassionally (hence possibly less sensitivity), why not have a person who is better at it. There is also this money one could potentially save by avoiding 'litigations' and the likes...

Just a thought guys, don't aim your guns at me!!!