April 25 2017 18:50
Navigation
bullet.gif Home
bullet.gif About NEPI
bullet.gif Contact NEPI
bullet.gif Help

Users Online
bullet.gif Guests Online: 1

bullet.gif Members Online: 0

bullet.gif Total Members: 304
bullet.gif Newest Member: ruthbrown
Latest Articles
bullet.gif New Pediatric Stroke...
bullet.gif EM Talks on MP3
bullet.gif Ethical & Legal Aspe...
bullet.gif Advanced Trauma Life...
bullet.gif Snakes of Medical Im...
RSS Feed
Discussion Forum
Host
NEPI website developed, maintained & supported by EmergencyMedicine.in
View Thread
NEPI » Emergency Medicine » Clinical case discussions
 Print Thread
Furosemide vs Nitrate
maroju
Back to the same old age old question - Is it furosemide or nitrates (GTN) that you'd reach for in a patient with acute heart failure? Agreed that both these drugs have some role but which is the first drug of choice?
 
imron
Furosemide is supposed to decrease preload with an immediate direct vascular action. Then has a delayed affect due to diuresis.
Takes seconds to break an ampoule and inject.

NTG is used to bridge the gap in between. Using well titrated infusion. But takes a few minutes to load onto infuser pumps.

Furosemide is first choice!

Would first consider NTG only if sublingual spray available.
 
www.emergencymedicine.in
stemlyns
Frusemide still.................I thought the world is moving on to new modailites.

Would not give frusemide as firstline to some who could be already dry as bone/??Vasculopath with knackered kidneys(I think most of the patients will have either of these two)
It is my personal choice though.

And the Jury is still out on which is the best(no difference in mortality i think)
 
stemlyns
Why not CPAP???(ofcourse after MI is excluded)
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Want to join a discussion?
Starting/Replying to a discussion thread in NEPI Forum
Copyright © 2006-2014 EmergencyMedicine.in All Rights Reserved